Green Street Consultant Says Market Open to “Non-traditional” REIT IPOs

Green Street Consultant Says Market Open to “Non-traditional” REIT IPOs

In the latest episode of The REIT Report: NAREIT’s Weekly Podcast, Dirk Aulabaugh, managing director with Green Street’s Advisory Group, gave his thoughts on the current environment for REIT initial public offerings.

Through the middle of August, four REIT IPOs have taken place, starting with the Invitation Homes (NYSE: IVH) offering in January that raised nearly $2 billion. Currently, however, Aulabaugh noted that the stocks of most REITs in the more “traditional” property sectors, such as office and multifamily, are trading at discounts to net asset value. On the other hand, newer sectors, such as data centers, are trading at premiums.

“In other words, if you own assets that fall into the non-traditional bucket, an IPO isn’t off the table right now,” Aulabaugh said.

The growth of e-commerce likely means the financial markets would be receptive to an industrial REIT IPO, according to Aulabaugh. IPOs of data center REITs also would be viewed favorably.

On the other hand, some mall REITs could turn into privatization targets, Aulabaugh said. “The malls are going to require capital and time to execute a creative strategy to reinvigorate the malls or convert them to a higher, better use,” he said, “and the public markets might not be the best place for that to happen.”

(Subscribe to The REIT Report via iTunes.)

(Why?)

Published at Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:11:23 +0000

Real Estate Fund Manager Says Europe Undervalued

Real Estate Fund Manager Says Europe Undervalued

In the latest episode of The REIT Report: NAREIT’s Weekly Podcast, portfolio manager Jay Leupp of Lazard Asset Management discussed his outlook for global real estate investment in the remainder of 2017.

Regarding the fallout from the Brexit vote, Leupp noted that he viewed the situation as a buying opportunity for U.K. real estate when the vote was held 12 months ago. Areas such as urban London presented attractive valuations, according to Leupp, offering opportunities to add to existing investment positions.

In terms of potentially undervalued markets, Leupp pointed to continental Europe. “We believe that the high-quality assets, particularly in the office, industrial and retail sectors are probably slightly undervalued,” he said. Leupp also singled out the German residential market as an attractive investment target.

In Asia, Leupp said he remains bullish on Hong Kong and China. He also noted emerging markets such as the Philippines are promising.

Leupp said the strong performance of property markets could be building to “a maturation in fundamentals” in some sectors. In general, “we’re being careful,” Leupp said.

(Subscribe to The REIT Report via iTunes.)

(Why?)

Published at Mon, 14 Aug 2017 17:32:59 +0000

MFA Financial Co-CEO William Gorin Dies at Age 59

MFA Financial Co-CEO William Gorin Dies at Age 59

MFA Financial, Inc. (NYSE: MFA) board member and co-CEO William Gorin has died at the age of 59, the company announced Aug. 11.

Gorin joined MFA in 1997 and was named CEO in January 2014. Before becoming CEO, Gorin served as president from 2008 to 2013. From 1997 to 2008, Gorin was executive vice president, and from 2001 to September 2010 he served as CFO. In addition, Gorin was treasurer and secretary at MFA.

Gorin also served as chair of NAREIT’s Mortgage REIT Council.

NAREIT President and CEO Steve Wechsler described Gorin as a “thoughtful and well-respected member of the REIT community” for two decades.

“Bill provided very effective and notably constructive leadership to the REIT industry as chair of NAREIT’s Mortgage REIT Council. His dedication to our industry was clearly evident as was his warmth, goodwill and graciousness to colleagues. Bill will be missed dearly by NAREIT and the REIT industry,” Wechsler said.

Prior to joining MFA, Gorin held various positions with PaineWebber Inc./Kidder, Peabody & Co. Inc., and Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. /E.F. Hutton & Company Inc.

Gorin is survived by his wife Jody and two children, Allie and Matthew. He graduated from Brandeis University and received an MBA from Stanford University.

(Why?)

Published at Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:46:20 +0000

Single-Family Rental REITs Invitation Homes, Starwood Waypoint to Merge

Single-Family Rental REITs Invitation Homes, Starwood Waypoint to Merge

Invitation Homes(NYSE: INVH) said Aug. 10 that it will combine with Starwood Waypoint Homes(NYSE: SFR) in an all-stock deal described by the two single-family rental housing REITs as a “merger of equals.”

Shares of both companies reacted positively to the news. In mid-morning trading, Invitation Homes share prices were 4.9 percent higher from the previous day’s closing price of $22.02. Starwood Waypoint share prices had gained 5.3 percent to $35.41.

Under the terms of the deal, each Starwood Waypoint Homes share of stock will be converted into 1.614 Invitation Homes shares, based on a fixed exchange ratio. Invitation Homes stockholders will own approximately 59 percent of the combined company’s stock, with current Starwood Waypoint Homes stockholders owning the remainder. The company will operate under the name Invitation Homes, and Starwood Waypoint Homes CEO Fred Tuomi will serve as CEO. Bryce Blair, currently chairman of Invitation Homes, will become chairman of the new entity.

The equity market capitalization of the combined company will be approximately $11 billion, based on the Aug. 9 closing share prices for both companies.

In a conference call, Tuomi described the two companies as “pioneers” of the single-family rental space. He stressed that Invitation Homes and Starwood Waypoint Homes are “nearly identical,” with 83 percent of the geographic footprint of their portfolios overlapping. The new company’s portfolio will contain approximately 82,000 single-family homes, located in 17 markets primarily in the Western United States and Florida.

Initial Reaction Positive

Jade Rahmani and Ryan Tomasello, analysts at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, commented that coupling Invitation Homes’ “local density and boots on the ground” with Starwood Waypoint’s emphasis on technology should help create a “leading, sustainable residential rental platform that over the long term has growth potential within both the single-family rental and broader residential housing markets.”

Citi Research analyst Michael Bilerman pointed out that the combined company will benefit from larger size and scale, geographic market overlap, and operational and general and administrative (G&A) synergies.

In terms of the broader industry implications, the transaction bolsters the scale and operational efficiency of leading players, according to Rahmani and Tomasello. “The transaction, if successful and well-received, could increase the likelihood of additional mergers in the industry,” they said.

Meanwhile, Tuomi noted that although the combined company will be the largest single-family rental company in the U.S., its portfolio still represents just a half percent of the nearly 16 million single-family homes for rent. Less than 2 percent of the nation’s single-family rental homes are institutionally owned, he added.

According to Tuomi, “demographic tailwinds remain at our feet,” as supply and demand fundamentals look favorable for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes, founded by private equity firm Blackstone in 2012, raised more than $1.5 billion in an initial public offering (IPO) in January. Following the proposed merger, Blackstone’s ownership stake in the combined company will drop to 41 percent from 70 percent in the current, stand-alone Invitation Homes.

The transaction is expected to close by the end of the year.

(Why?)

Published at Thu, 10 Aug 2017 19:07:24 +0000

REIT Returns Modestly Higher in July

REIT Returns Modestly Higher in July

REIT returns were modestly higher in July, although certain property segments continue to post outsized gains.

The total returns of the FTSE NAREIT All REITs Index rose 1.2 percent in July, while the S&P 500 posted a total return of 2.1 percent. For the first seven months of 2017, total returns of the FTSE NAREIT All REITs Index gained 6.7 percent, while the S&P 500 returned 11.6 percent.

Total returns of the FTSE/NAREIT All Equity REITs Index gained 1.3 percent in July and 6.2 percent through the first seven months of the year. The total return of the FTSE NAREIT Mortgage REIT Index rose 0.4 percent in July and 16.5 percent for the year to July 31.

The yield on the 10-year Treasury note was flat in July. Through July 31, it dropped 0.1 percent for the year.

“Overall, we’re seeing a decent amount of growth, but there’s been no break-out growth from the REIT sector,” said David Rodgers, senior analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co. He pointed out that the more moderate pace of growth “makes sense” following REITs’ outperformance of the last several years.

Meanwhile, Brad Case, NAREIT senior vice president for research and industry information, pointed out that the stock market rally seen this year has been concentrated in stocks that are already expensive relative to their earnings, particularly large-cap growth stocks.

While some REITs are large-cap stocks, “they’re not large relative to the behemoths that dominate that part of the market,” Case explained. He noted that a more accurate assessment of REITs can be made by comparing their performance to that of small-cap value stocks, which historically are most similar to REITs.

Small-cap value stocks, as measured by the Russell 2000 Value Index, gained 0.6 percent during July and 1.2 percent year-to-date, Case noted.

“Investors hold REITs because they want the asset class diversification benefits of real estate, and this year has been a good example of that because REITs have so strongly outperformed the non-REIT stocks that are otherwise most similar to them,” Case said.

Meanwhile, Rodgers stressed that as the real estate cycle becomes more advanced, investors are becoming increasingly selective as to which REIT segments they own. That has led to healthy gains in several REIT property types.

Industrial REITs posted returns of 3.5 percent in July and 15.1 percent for the year to July 31. According to Rodgers, second quarter industrial earnings calls have generally been more bullish compared to the previous quarter.

Returns for data center REITs totaled 4.1 percent in July and 26.6 percent through July 31. Manufactured home REITs recorded returns of 1.2 percent in July and 20.1 percent for the first seven months of the year. Infrastructure REITs also had a solid performance, with return of 2.1 percent and 24.8 percent year-to-date.

Shopping center REIT returns of 7.7 percent led the pack in July, although returns are 11.7 percent lower year-to-date.

(Why?)

Published at Tue, 01 Aug 2017 19:58:44 +0000

Former Host Hotels CEO Says Financial Crisis Posed Greatest Challenge of His Career

Former Host Hotels CEO Says Financial Crisis Posed Greatest Challenge of His Career

In the latest episode of The REIT Report: NAREIT’s Weekly Podcast, Ed Walter, the former CEO of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (NYSE: HST) and the 2013 NAREIT Chair, offered his thoughts on some of the transformative events in the REIT market and hotel business during his career.

In terms of changes to the lodging sector, Walter pointed out that views on the experiences of guests “evolved in a very significant way.” In the 1990s and early 2000s, hotel REITs focused on improvements to guest rooms, including upgrading bedding and installing flat-panel televisions. Now, companies are focusing on “creating more of an experience throughout the hotel, especially in the lobby,” according to Walter.

“That notion of making the lobby and the other facilities and amenities that are part of that a more important part of the hotel experience helps make the hotel more memorable and the travel more fun,” Walter said.

In making the transition to the role of chief executive, Walter said he was surprised by the amount of time he dedicated to working with the broader REIT industry. These efforts included interacting with policymakers regarding issues such as supporting the terrorism insurance market and labor regulations. Walter also noted that his time in leadership roles at NAREIT showed that chief executives in REITs and publicly traded real estate companies are committed to working together for the betterment of the industry.

Regarding the biggest challenges he faced as CEO of Host Hotels, Walter reflected on the global financial crisis that began around the time he started the job. “Nobody really anticipated that liquidity would dry up as rapidly and as comprehensively as it did,” he said. At the same time, Corporate America came under fire for spending on travel and company events, which hurt business at Host properties.

“We couldn’t even predict what the year was going to look like,” he recalled. “For about a 15-month period, every forecast that we got from our properties was worse than the last one.”

Walter also pointed to the financial crisis as Host’s greatest success during his tenure.

“We looked for opportunities where we could take advantage of the dislocation in an intelligent way,” he said. “Collectively, the different steps that we took… put Host in the position to not only ride out the downturn—even in the volatile business we were in—but to really position ourselves to outperform.”

(Subscribe to The REIT Report via iTunes.)

(Why?)

Published at Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:54:21 +0000

S&P’s Michael Wilkins on the Transparency of Green Investment

S&P’s Michael Wilkins on the Transparency of Green Investment

Michael WilkinsDriven in large part by the Paris climate agreement, the capital markets have taken a keen interest in the trillions of dollars in financing need to meet the global community’s environmental objectives.

That has also created a need for more rigorous assessments of the environmental quality of investments, according to Michael Wilkins, head of environmental and climate risk research for S&P Global Ratings. Earlier this year, S&P unveiled its Green Evaluation service intended to boost transparency and help investors identify worthwhile environmental projects. REIT magazine spoke with Wilkins about the growing demand for green projects and how they’re being financed, as well as how S&P’s new service aims to help assess the environmental quality of these projects.

REIT: Can you explain what the objectives of the Green Evaluations are?

Michael Wilkins: The main objective is to try and give a relative ranking of environmental impact of green financing, whether or not it’s a bond or a loan or any other type of capital markets instrument. The idea is essentially that investors are now asking what the green quality of their investment is, as well as asking what their credit quality is. While our traditional credit ratings can address the issue of credit, they don’t address the issue of environmental impact.

We’ve developed this new product, called the Green Evaluation, that provides specifically that kind of information: Not only what the environmental impact is, but also how the financing is being managed from the point of view of the transparency in governments and of the use of proceeds, which are extremely important aspects of being a part of the finance market.

The investors want to know that their money is going to environmentally beneficial causes and not being diverted elsewhere. They don’t want to be greenwashed at all, so that’s why that aspect is also equally important to what the environmental impact is.

That’s why we are doing this, to provide that extra little bit of transparency and granularity to address the community about environmental impact to allow them to benchmark their financing instruments, based on those criteria.

REIT: I see more and more discussion about resilience in green investment. Can you tell us what that really means?

Wilkins: Resilience is really how strong and how durable a particular infrastructure asset may be in respect to its ability to withstand the damages caused by extreme weather events brought about by climate change. For example, if we see financing being directed to reinforce an infrastructure asset, such as a bridge or a water treatment plant, against the impact of severe weather—floods, storms, high winds, whatever it may be—what kind of damage could be caused to that infrastructure?

That actual damage can be modeled and is modeled very regularly by insurance companies as part of catastrophic loss policies. That type of modeling can be used, as our insurance colleagues know, for testing the resilience level or the resilience benefit that the finance can bring about.

REIT: Does resilience come up a lot in your discussions with investors?

“Investors are now asking what the green quality of their investment is, as well as asking what their credit quality is.” – Michael Wilkins

Wilkins: It is coming up more and more. Most of the financing in the green bond market, which is probably the most developed out of all the green financial markets, has been directed to what are known as mitigation projects. These are projects aimed at cutting carbon emissions mainly and also improving water usage. Those types of projects are known as mitigation because they mitigate the impact of human activity on the environment. They account for about 90 percent of all financings, and we’re seeing the rest being directed towards adaptation, especially in developing markets, where the impact of catastrophic weather events is more acute than for the impact they have on infrastructure.

We are also seeing more and more in the U.S., especially along the East Coast, where recent damages caused by Superstorm Sandy caused a lot of strengthening of transmission lines, water treatment plants and other infrastructure assets. That type of investment has been financed to a large degree by municipalities by the issuance of municipal bonds. Those types of bond issuances are directed towards adaptation. We are expecting a lot of demand to be coming from that space.

REIT: It seems as though digging in to look at projects on the asset level, which the Green Evaluation aims to do, is somewhat difficult. How precise can these ratings really be?

Wilkins: Well, it is a question of providing a relative ranking. We’re not taking into account absolute measures on carbon reduction, for example.

What we’re trying to do is say, if you have a financing of a $100 million in a particular project, which has 8 percent of the proceeds directed to wind power in the U.S. and 20 percent for solar in Mexico, from a perspective of environmental benefits, how is that investment going to compare to, say, financing another $100 million into clean coal conversion plants in China?

As an investor, you can decide how you want to put your green allocation in your portfolio to work to achieve the best possible environmental outcome. That’s the intention behind the Green Evaluation. It provides a relative ranking, rather than to provide an environmental audit of a firm’s investment into specific technology.  It has more to do with what this technology is going to contribute to the environment.

REIT: Are there any plans to build out to broader looks at portfolios of assets?

Wilkins: Absolutely. We see quite a lot of green financing being done on a portfolio basis, especially given that a lot of these projects are quite small on an individual basis, like energy-efficiency projects. Even renewables, in terms of capital employed, are very small, so that requires them to be brought together as portfolios and bundled into higher structured transactions.

We see a lot in the world of project financing, for example. That’s quite an obvious use of this type of tool. We’re also seeing that from the perspective of financial institutions. For example, a bank will raise a green bond, and then it will allocate the proceeds of that green bond to a number of existing projects which it may have exposure to on its own book. That’s another type of portfolio approach.

We can actually take into account that type of disaggregation of proceeds by looking at each individual asset type on a separate basis and looking at each individual asset type’s contribution from an environmental perspective and then bringing it up together on our way to the aggregate basis again in the final score.

REIT: What are some of the greatest differences in reporting from region to region around the world?

Wilkins: If you are issuing a labeled green bond, then you are more likely than not to adhere to green bond principles, which were established a couple of years ago by the International Capital Markets Association. Those principles, which were developed by a group of about 12 underwriting banks, provide a discipline to the market in terms of requiring a certain level of reporting and disclosure as to the allocation of the proceeds from the bond issue—not just the allocation, but also the way that the financing is allocated and how you are seeing a commitment to reporting, a level of disclosure, the methodology for the calculation of the environmental impact and so on.

There’s quite a lot of detail suggested as best practice that is followed under the green bond principles. The same goes for governance surrounding the use of proceeds and how those funds are managed and how they are verified and tracked. That is also included.

To try and do that, it does require a certain level of additional cost and effort. Some financing entities may be put off from doing it, but if that’s the case, then the investors may be put off from buying their instruments—because they are looking for that level of extra transparency and governance as a form of protection against greenwashing.

While we see a lot of the labeled green bonds stick to the green bond principles, outside of the labeled green bond sector, there is less emphasis on this type of reporting, regardless of which region we are talking about.

If you don’t have that strict adherence to these types of principles, the danger is their funds could be misallocated, or it may not be clear as to what the benefit of the investment actually is. That’s the important thing to bear in mind.

“As an investor, you can decide how you want to put your green allocation in your portfolio to work to achieve the best possible environmental outcome.” – Michael Wilkins

Now, that’s not to say that there are some financings out there which may not be labeled green, but may still have a green component to them. We can still assess those through the Green Evaluation tool. The chances are that the transparency and governance score will be lower, which will bring the overall score down, but the environmental impact is more important. It is more highly weighted in the overall score.

REIT: In terms of the green assets that you could evaluate, do we have any idea about what the size of the market is here?

Wilkins: If we look at solely the labeled green bond market, issuance in 2016 was around $100 billion. This year, estimates are ranging up to $200 billion—so, basically, doubling in size.

Probably more important than that is the bigger pool of investment in environmental projects which may not be labeled green. In the world of infrastructure and real state, that is huge. The infrastructure market is somewhere in the region of nearly $3-4 trillion per annum in terms of funding that is raised in the capital markets. In terms of the overlap between green finance and infrastructure, it’s around 75 percent.

So 75 percent of all infrastructure investment needs to have some sort of green or sustainable component to it. That gives you a size of scale of the potential market.

Of course, not all of that will be 100 percent green: Some of it will be partially green, some of it won’t be green at all, some of it will be fossil fuel. But as we move and transition towards a low-carbon environment, it will begin to increase more and more. There will be more interest from investors to make sure that their allocations to those types of investments are increased.

Countries such as France require institutional investors to disclose how their assets under management are contributing to that transition to low-carbon. That is driving demand, so I think we are kind of seeing a convergence of investor demand and issuer requirements for green investments.

Michael Wilkins is a managing director with S&P Global Ratings based out of London. He serves as head of environmental and climate risk research for S&P. Wilkins specializes in corporate and project finance credit analysis, carbon markets, and other aspects of climate and environmental finance.

(Why?)

Published at Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:54:04 +0000

Sustainability: Together and Now

Sustainability: Together and Now

Let’s all be honest with one another, who hasn’t noticed any changes to our natural surroundings, such as weather patterns, seasonal shifts, wild life, pollution or other factors? It is increasingly apparent that rapid population growth and industrialization are producing alterations to our planet’s ecosystems, and it is likely that these trends will continue, if not intensify.

Two key touchstones of this pernicious problem are that we all own it together and something needs to be done now, as opposed to later. As commercial real estate owners, we have an important role to play in contributing solutions to these environmental challenges. Buildings account for over one-third of total final energy use and 19 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.

So we at Boston Properties(NYSE: BXP) are very focused on sustainability because of its positive environmental impacts and because we believe it makes business sense. Our company was founded in 1970 and builds, owns and manages high-quality office and residential assets in leading U.S. cities. Our success in this highly competitive business has depended on, among many other things, attracting creditworthy tenants (who often have their own sustainability goals and awareness), developing and managing best-in-class work environments (integrating green building features), exploiting advances in technology to maximize profitability in all aspects of our operations (including energy and water conservation), maintaining strong relationships with the communities we serve (who have their own sustainability emphasis and strategies), and attracting and retaining great employees (many of whom care deeply about our natural environment).

As sustainability has become more important to our tenants, shareholders, employees and community stakeholders, we have been in the fortunate position of having a good story to tell and are continuously focused on improving our performance. The foundation of our sustainability efforts has been environmental impact mitigation, where we have stated public goals. In our 2016 Sustainability Report, we announced the early achievement of our 2020 reduction targets for energy, water and greenhouse gas emissions. During the 2016 calendar year alone, we reduced like-for-like energy and water use 6.9 percent and 4.0 percent, respectively, saving approximately $10.7 million in annual recurring operating costs.

We increasingly use third-party validation tools to measure our performance, improve our transparency and reinforce the credibility of our sustainability accomplishments. We have steadily grown our LEED® Certified green building portfolio to over 17 million square feet and have certified 62 properties representing 68 percent of our eligible floor area under the ENERGY STAR® Commercial Buildings Program. Over the last five years, we have participated in the Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB®) assessment and in 2016, we earned our fifth consecutive Green Star, ranking among the top 5 percent of 733 global participants.

Looking ahead, there is much more to do, and we will continue to implement policies, programs and projects that complement sustainable development and operations. Our experience demonstrates that through our activities as real estate owners, developers and managers, we can contribute to environmental solutions as a positive force while improving our financial performance and becoming a stronger, more purposeful organization in the process.

(Why?)

Published at Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:17:54 +0000

Retail REITs in Adaptation Mode

Retail REITs in Adaptation Mode

Negative news about store closings have cast a shadow over the business of retail REITs. But regional mall and shopping center REITs face the challenge with an air of resilience and, for some, even optimism.

“The news isn’t all bad for retail REITs, even though there’s headline noise around the retailers themselves about store closures and competition from e-commerce,” says Ross Smotrich, managing director and senior research analyst with Barclays Capital. “News of all the store closures leads investors to assume retail is dead, but that’s not accurate.”

Some measures of operating performance did slow in the first quarter of 2017 compared to 96.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016. Occupancy rates for retail REITs averaged 95.3 percent in the first quarter of 2017, according to Calvin Schnure, senior vice president of research and economic analysis at NAREIT. Schnure noted that occupancy in the sector typically declines in the first quarter due to normal seasonal variations. Sector funds from operations averages dipped approximately 5 percent in the first quarter of the year compared with the same period in 2016. Meanwhile, investors earned $2.3 billion in dividends from retail REITs in the first three months of 2017, down 10 percent from the year-earlier period.

However, Schnure points out that fundamentals in the retail REIT sector were strong in 2016. Overall, he says the sector remains on solid ground from a fundamentals standpoint.

“The data show staying power and stability among retail REITs, which tend to own high-quality properties in the more desirable areas” Schnure says.

Historical Shifts in Retail

Milton Cooper, co-founder of Kimco Realty Corp.(NYSE: KIM), is well-known for saying “the only constant in retail is change.” Current Kimco CEO Conor Flynn understands what that challenge means now. He also sees opportunity for Kimco.

Sector Stats

Sector: Retail
Constituents: 30
One-year Return: -18.39%
Three-Year Return: -0.08%
Five-Year Return: 5.34%
Dividend Yield: 4.92%
Market Cap ($M): 57,481
Avg. Daily Volume (Shares): 3,062.7
(Data as of June 15, 2017)

“The big issue is perception versus reality,” says Flynn. “This isn’t the death of all retail real estate. In fact, our occupancy rate for spaces with more than 10,000 square feet is 97.3 percent. In addition, 65 percent of our leases are at below-market rents, so vacancies that do occur offer us an opportunity to raise the rent to market rate and to redevelop the space.”

Alexander Goldfarb, managing director and senior REIT analyst at Sandler O’Neill + Partners, says people forget that retail has always been under attack in some way, pointing to the hype about the appearance of big box stores as “category killers” and the shrinking number of department store brands over the past decade.

However, Goldfarb acknowledges that this cycle is different because of several factors.

“During the financial crisis, consumers realized you can do with less, so their buying habits have changed,” says Goldfarb. “People’s preferences have changed, too, so now they spend a lot more on their smart phones than they used to and more on eating in restaurants.”

Laurel Durkay, vice president and associate portfolio manager for the real estate securities team at Cohen & Steers, says there’s a distinct “share of wallet” shift among consumers.

“People spend more on experiences like travel and home furnishings and less on clothing,” she says. “REITs actively manage their response to this with experiential retail, adding elaborate playgrounds and restaurants to their tenant mix.”

Competition and Collaboration With e-Commerce

The evolution of consumer habits doesn’t mean that brick-and-mortar stores will disappear, says Goldfarb. Retailers, including previously purely e-commerce companies, understand the need to get closer to consumers and to deal with returns more efficiently.

“Retailers have discovered the ‘tethering’ effect: When they close a store, local online sales fall, and when they open a store, local online sales increase,” Flynn points out.

Consumers still want to touch and feel the goods they’re buying, which is why the omni-channel strategy is ultimately the solution to long-term viability, says Chris Weilminster, president of the mixed-use division of Federal Realty Investment Trust(NYSE: FRT).

“We take advantage of being part of the ‘last mile’ location close to a customer’s home or work,” Flynn says. “Our retailers realize that we live in an on-demand world and that linking online ordering to in-store pick-ups and returns drives traffic.”

Even grocery stores are adapting by offering click-and-pick-up services and emphasizing different products now that so many people order nonperishable items from sites like Amazon and Jet, Smotrich says. It remains to be seen how Amazon’s June announcement of a planned $13.7 billion acquisition of Whole Foods will impact the grocery shopping market.

Bifurcation Within Retail Sector

All retail centers are not equally impacted by the latest changes in the retail business.

“The retail sector has always experienced disruption, but now we’re experiencing a permanent disruption in the way consumers shop,” Weilminster says. “But the end result is a flight to quality.”

Smotrich says he sees bifurcation among malls and shopping centers, with A-quality property thriving. “REITs that already own high-end assets, who have a quality balance sheet and a quality operating system, will continue to thrive,” he says.

Overall, the retail real estate market is currently facing an oversupply of retail space in the U.S, according to Durkay. She notes that whereas the U.S. has 24 square feet of retail space per person, the U.K. has five.

Schnure agrees oversupply is definitely an issue, but location matters.

“There’s no oversupply in areas with a high-income, growing population, and most of the older malls in areas with a slower economy aren’t owned by REITs,” says Schnure.

Retail REIT Strength

Some retail REITs are cleaning up their portfolios by selling lower-quality assets and redeveloping properties, Smotrich says.

Kimco sold $5 billion of real estate in the past five years, primarily in secondary and tertiary markets. That has helped the longstanding retail REIT focus on the top 20 major markets in the U.S., Flynn says. Kimco has moved out of markets that have abundant shopping centers and into locales with population and wage growth and increasing household formations, among other things.

Additionally, retail REITs are positioning their shopping centers and malls as community gathering places, not just shopping destinations.

“We create larger public spaces to bring people together for concerts and things like ‘mommy-and-me’ events,” says Weilminster. “For a retail center to be successful, it’s important to have something that’s a daily draw like a grocery store or a health club and then add in entertainment and restaurants. You can’t have a single-purpose retail center anymore.”

Mixed-use developments also offer a solution. “We look for the best possible mix of retailers and entertainment amenities that offer a European living environment and access to mass transit,” Weilminster says. At Assembly Row in Somerville, Massachusetss, for example, Federal Realty changed the dynamic of the city and the fabric of the community by getting a local train stop built.

Other steps taken by retail REITs include limiting their exposure to any one tenant.

“For a retail center to be successful, it’s important to have something that’s a daily draw like a grocery store or a health club and then add in entertainment and restaurants.”
– Chris Weilminster, Federal Realty Investment Trust

“Kimco has 8,700 leases and 4,100 tenants, so we have tremendous diversity in our tenants,” says Flynn. “Our top tenant is TJ Maxx, but even that tenant rents just 4.2 percent of our leasable space. Seven of our top 10 largest tenants hit all-time high sales last year, so many of them are even expanding.”

Some categories of retail that are doing particularly well, according to Flynn, include off-price stores, home improvement stores, specialty grocery stores, craft stores, fitness centers and beauty supply stores. Seritage Growth Properties(NYSEMKT: SRG) is experiencing success renting to those types of tenants, as well, according to Benjamin Schall, the company’s president and CEO. Seritage, which spun off from Sears Holding Corp. in 2015, is projecting that less than 50 percent of its income will come from Sears by the end of 2017, down from 80 percent around the time Seritage went public. As of June, the company had leased 3 million square feet of space in the preceding 18 months while converting single-tenant buildings to multi-tenant shopping centers. Rents on those spaces jumped to $18 per foot, roughly four-and-a-half times what Seritage was generating when the space was rented to Sears.

“We expect 50 percent of income to come from newly developed shopping centers occupied by best-in-class retailers that we believe will continue to resonate with consumers in an omni-channel world,” Schall says.

Opportunities for REITs and Investors

Although some disruption will likely continue in the near term for retail real estate companies, according to Durkay, the highest-quality property managers and owners will continue to find opportunities for growth in the long term.

“That’s why quality is of utmost importance,” Durkay says.

Flynn says Kimco is achieving internal growth through redevelopment. It is currently spending $1 billion on construction to expand space for restaurants and grocery stores. The company is also adding apartments and hotels to transit-oriented sites.

“Now that people are using ridesharing options and public transit and eventually will rely on driverless cars, we’re looking to unlock the value in our parking lots to convert them to a net asset value,” says Kimco’s CEO. “In order to drive retail growth and sales tax revenue, jurisdictions may need to approve rezoning so we can develop apartments, offices and hotels on those lots.”

Meanwhile, as retail REITs evaluate the health of their portfolios, they’re also reaching out to investors to help them understand the upside of investing in retail.

“We explain to investors that our below-market leases offer an opportunity to unlock future value, our balance sheet is stronger than ever, and we have tremendous liquidity to repurpose and adapt to future changes in retail,” says Flynn.

Goldfarb says that even though some investors might be shaken, he thinks most have confidence that the retail REITs can survive and thrive.

“People need to realize that physical retail is not going away,” he says. “The REITs that have the financial capital to get through this cycle will do fine.”

Environmental Impact of Online and In-Person Shopping

A 2016 study by Simon Property Group(NYSE: SPG) and Deloitte Consulting compared the environmental impact of shopping for a product online with shopping at a brick-and-mortar store. They found something surprising: Online shopping has a 7 percent greater environmental impact than shopping at a physical store.

Researchers took into account the material, energy and fuel used to provide a product to an online customer and an in-person customer. It was determined that per-product impact was higher for online orders because of increased packaging and the high transportation costs of delivering one or a few products to consumers’ homes.

(Why?)

Published at Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:25:02 +0000

ESG Reporting Shows Increased Significance for REITs

ESG Reporting Shows Increased Significance for REITs

When it comes to sustainability, REITs have made significant strides over the years in terms of environmental practices. They’re reducing energy and water use, lowering carbon footprints and improving waste management.

Yet, the idea of sustainability has come to encompass more than just environmental impact. More companies—and the stakeholders that monitor them—are broadening their definition of sustainability to include environmental, social and governance  factors, commonly referred to as ESG.

REITs certainly have had programs aimed at the social component, such as philanthropy, community involvement and health of employees. They’ve also continued to enhance their already strong governance practices over the years. Now, they are looking at how to systematize these components under the greater framework of corporate responsibility and how it aligns with a REIT’s overall strategy.

The refined approach makes business sense, since good social and governance policies have a material effect on the business in the long run. “It’s a matter of looking through the lens of triple-bottom line reporting and the fact that today for public companies, it’s not just the financials that are important for the business to be considered run well,” says Mark Delisi, senior director of corporate responsibility for AvalonBay Communities Inc. (NYSE: AVB). “Taking into account the ‘S’ and ‘G’ is table stakes for companies that are operating in the 21st century.”

Getting Engaged

The major reporting frameworks for sustainability now ask for information in the social and governance areas. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and GRESB have increasingly integrated social and governance issues into their questionnaires over the years. GRI’s 2016 standards had 19 social categories, including areas such as employment, labor/management relations, training and education, diversity and equal opportunity, and local communities. GRESB, which is geared toward real estate companies, includes a stakeholder engagement section. Last year, it introduced a separate module for reporting on health and well-being for employees and products and services. The GRESB survey also has questions on governance practices.

The increasing focus on social and governance in part comes from investors, who are looking for a more holistic approach by companies. It’s more than just spreadsheets that predict a certain return for a company, says Dan Winters, head of the Americas for GRESB.

“Investing is an art not a science,” he says. “You have to manage a series of often unknown and complex business risks in order to get to a long-term return projection.”

Good social and governance policies will translate into better returns overall, experts say. It all starts with engaging stakeholders. Surveys of various constituents, such as investors, tenants, employees, vendors and communities, show what issues are important to them and how they see them impacting a business.

REITs are increasingly providing information on stakeholder engagement in their sustainability reports in the form of “materiality matrices,” four-quadrant grids that highlight the areas that are both important and have a high impact on business. For Boston Properties Inc. (NYSE: BXP), social issues of high impact and importance include public transportation, employee health, community involvement and employee training. Similarly, access to transit and amenities, local communities ranked high in the 2016 sustainability report for Kilroy Realty Corp. (NYSE: KRC), along with governance issues such as anti-corruption, transparency, environmental grievance mechanisms and environmental compliance. 

Health and Wellness

While it’s difficult to measure the effects of social initiatives, it’s clear they can have a positive effect on worker productivity and, by extension, profits. One area is health and well-being.

Certifications based on building “health” are gaining ground with some REITs. One of them, Fitwel, was developed in part by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the General Services Administration (GSA). It evaluates features of buildings such as access to fitness facilities, proximity to public transit, design of outdoor spaces, indoor air quality and healthy food options. Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE: ARE) and Kilroy are examples of REITs receiving certifications for some of their buildings.

“There is a lot that owners can do to improve health and well-being at their properties,” says Daniele Horton, founder and president of Verdani Partners, a sustainability consulting firm that advises real estate owners.

One of the properties under development for Kilroy, a mixed-use project in San Francisco, will include features focused on health and productivity, such as open stairwells, low-emitting construction materials and enhanced filtration to maintain indoor air quality. The site, 100 Hooper, will also encourage bike transport, with showers and lockers.

These things translate to the bottom line and are more material than quantifiable energy savings, notes Sara Neff, senior vice president of sustainability at Kilroy. “The gains from productivity of your employees can dwarf your utility bill,” she says. “It is the thing that tenants should be asking about, and the more sophisticated tenants are.”

In fact, air quality for employees has become an important consideration for tenants. Boston Properties’ 888 Boylston Street in Boston—a 17-story, 425,000-square-foot office building—has an HVAC system that provides 30 percent more fresh air and 50 percent more air changes per hour than a typical office building, without compromising energy performance.

“There is clear empirical evidence linking fresh air and daylight access with improved health and productivity,” says Ben Myers, sustainability manager at Boston Properties. “We are focused on providing indoor environments that maximize the potential of our customers.”  

By demonstrating leadership on ESG issues, Myers says Boston Properties is able to strengthen its relationship with the communities it serves. 

“As an owner and developer, it is useful during the permitting and approval process to have an established record of delivering sustainable projects that mutually benefit our shareholders, customers, and local community stakeholders,” he says.

“By being perceived in the marketplace as a green company, a sustainable company, it helps us as we approach municipal officials, through permitting and entitlement,” Myers adds. 

Aligning Social Goals to Company’s Mission

REITs are also starting to focus their giving by partnering with non-profits that make sense with their lines of business. These types of social initiatives come with a sense of “shared value,” Delisi explains.

“If every REIT looks in the mirror, they will see components of the ‘S’ and ‘G’ already in place,” he says. “The difference now is partly the intentionality and strategy behind it and how the ‘S’ has moved away from check writing to real shared value.”

For AvalonBay, this has meant concentrating in recent years on corporate giving for disaster preparedness, affordable housing and support for the disadvantaged.

However, the apartment REIT is taking steps beyond cash outlays. For example, AvalonBay gives to the Arlington Partnership for Affordable Housing, but it is also assisting the organization in the construction of libraries in some of its buildings, lending design expertise and helping out with book drives.

“We are getting involved with a lot of these organizations pretty deeply in terms of helping them not just with pure volunteers, but also with some of their business challenges,” Delisi says. “We can bring to bear some of our development expertise, operations expertise and our design expertise to help them solve these challenges.”

“We can find a way to do social investment, philanthropy, community investment and volunteerism, but have it also strategically mapped back to what is good for the company,” Delisi adds. “It is not a mutually exclusive proposition. Companies can and should be social investors while still making a profit.”

Good Governance Needed for Sustainable Success

While the social component of sustainability is gaining momentum with REITs, it wouldn’t amount to much without good governance.

There are the general corporate governance issues: executive compensation, shareholder rights, diversity and equal opportunity, bribery and corruption, and worker rights. (These are all now part of GRESB’s annual survey.) More specifically, REITs are starting to fold in governance issues with respect to sustainability in order for the “E” and the “S” to get done.

Governance with respect to sustainability can include setting the tone at the top of a firm with the chief executive, instituting a sustainability committee, and regularly reviewing the program with a company’s board of directors.

Diversity is another emerging area with respect to governance. Kimco Realty Corp. (NYSE: KIM), for example, has instituted an internal talent incubator dubbed “Leaders Advancing Business Strategies.” It groups teams with members across the organization. Women’s representation in the program in 2016 was in the high 30s in terms of percentage; this year their share is in the high 40s. The company also recently launched a training program exclusively for 40 female employees.

While it’s difficult to measure the qualitative nature of these types of programs, they do translate to the bottom line, notes Will Teichman, senior director of strategic operations at Kimco. Not all companies actively pursue them, though.

“In some cases, folks today are missing the real quantitative benefits that can come from things like employee engagement and employee retention,” he says. “Every time you lose a new employee and have to go backfill that position and train the new person, there are real dollars and cents associated with that.”

“If your tenants are diverse, your company leadership should also reflect that,” adds Horton of Verdani Partners. “Research shows that companies that have better gender diversity and leadership have been doing better financially because they are able to better understand their different consumer groups and preferences.”

Other governance measures are in their infancy for REITs. One that has gained some traction includes resiliency planning, such as preparing properties for floods and other disasters. For example, in a building under development by Boston Properties at the Brooklyn Naval Yard in New York, all critical equipment will rest 32 feet above grade. Onsite generators will provide 1,500 kilowatts of emergency power for building and tenant use.

Looking ahead, the REITs that view the “E,” the “S” and the “G” as intertwined say that approach will only help with the investors they court.

“Investors understand a robust sustainability program is an indicator of good governance,” Myers says. “They are still trying to figure out how to evaluate and incorporate sustainability into their models. They are not adjusting their positions distinctly because of a company’s sustainability program, but they may look favorably on your company because of governance.”  

Creating Dividends Through Diversity

Diane Morefield, CFO of CyrusOne(NASDAQ: CONE), sees a direct correlation between real estate companies that embrace women in leadership roles and enhanced shareholder value.

Companies that fail to recognize the essential role women play in helping to shape a broad swath of real estate-related decisions are “really missing out,” she says. Morefield says she has enjoyed a rewarding career in real estate, but she still sees the number of women in leadership roles within the industry as much too low.

“I haven’t seen the needle move,” she says.

NAREIT hopes its new Dividends Through Diversity Initiative, which launched earlier this year and held its kick-off reception at at REITWeek 2017, will take steps to change that. Morefield is chairing the initiative’s steering committee.

Bonnie Gottlieb, NAREIT’s senior vice president for industry and member affairs, says the stated goal of the initiative is to promote the recruitment, inclusion and advancement of women in REITs and the broader commercial real estate industry.

To that end, the Dividends Through Diversity Initiative will foster information sharing, education and career development, mentoring and networking events, among other things.

Two half-day meetings are expected to be held in the next 12 months featuring NAREIT members and nationally known speakers on diversity-related issues and career development. In addition, the initiative will select new associates at REITs or other NAREIT member companies who exemplify outstanding leadership qualities, to attend one of two half-day meetings.

“I really hope now that in the next five to 10 years, we see the needle move, that we start seeing more women in C-level roles and on boards across the REIT industry and the related companies that serve our industry,” Morefield says.

Dividends Through Diversity Initiative Steering Committee
Diane Morefield, CyrusOne; Angela Aman, Brixmor Property Group Inc; Kelly Cheng, Barclays; William Ferguson, Ferguson Partners Ltd.; Mary Hogan-Preusse, Sturgis Partners LLC; Lisa Kaufman, LaSalle Investment Management; Sheila McGrath, Evercore ISI; Marguerite Nader, Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.; Sherry Rexroad, BlackRock; Martin Stein, Jr., Regency Centers Corp.; Tracy Ward, Prologis, Inc.

(Why?)

Published at Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:32:22 +0000