TYT Hour – July 16th, 2010

www.theyoungturks.com New TYT Facebook Page(!): www.facebook.com Subscribe to the FREE Video Podcast on iTunes: bit.ly Follow us on Twitter: twitter.com DISCOUNTS: www.theyoungturks.com FREE Movies(!): www.netflix.com Note: The above two links are for TYT sponsors. Read Ana’s blog and subscribe at: www.examiner.com TYT Network (new WTF?! channel): www.youtube.com Check Out TYT Interviews www.youtube.com Watch more at www.theyoungturks.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5

www.laposte.fr Film “Robot Party!!” : www.youtube.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5

50 Replies to “TYT Hour – July 16th, 2010”

  1. Watch”`Movies’~;Online”‘~Here~`;
    WWW.WATCHFULLMOVIES5.TK
    COPY.;’THE;;,URL;`’ABOVE.’`

  2. @np33123 musluman olup olmaması seni niye bu kadar ilgilendiriyor , bizim insanımız olması yeterli

  3. Cenk kardes Masa Allah cok akilli sin boyle bir show yapmak icin cok tilki gibi olman lazim . Agizana saglik.

  4. @MrBagelis7 I think this may be the stupidest most uncompromisable youtube comment I have ever seen. CONGRATULATIONS

  5. son of a bitch we ainth young turks wtf is the name of this show young turks wtf ur turk mothers ass when the turk had a opinion about something they were some son of a bitches fucking animals in my a GOOD turk IS A DEAD TURK the 1 who raises those shit is a bitch ass.

  6. @funkateerkitty
    If you don’t want to argue then you should not have replied.

    Let me ask you this question, if we are invaded by another nation, who stands to loose the most? The rich, correct? And what will be affected? Is it the $40K someone makes a year but spends on food and shelter? Or is it the “wealth” that has been accumulated by the rich?

    The JUST thing to do is NOT to tax incoming but tax wealth, period.

  7. @satarnag
    Unless you somehow take over your son’s body after you die, he is a different individual, correct? If you give your money (after tax) to another individual, it is a income to that individual, correct? Why should that income, which he is earning solely because he is your son, different from his other incoming? Not to mention, he is getting 7 million tax free as it is.

    IRS did come in 1913 with the 16th amendment. However, progressive taxation was used during the civil war.

  8. @satarnag
    I speak of the tea party of today, after the hijack if you want to distance yourself.

    Just because you personally do not disapprove of Obama because of his skin, does not mean other people in your party are not racists. The so called “Tea Party Movement” might have borrowed something from Ron Paul but really started after Obama took office.

    Speaking of ignorance, the whole “Tea Party” theme is rather ignorant of history. The Boston Tea Party was about profit, not tax.

  9. @IamtheSamis

    And STILL! You’ve been saying you quit for days now, continuing the lie. You’re a hypocrite for calling my mistake a lie, and constantly so, when you made the bigger mistake of saying I responded to you to start this all off.

    And STILL! You’re going down the path of Red Herring, trying to drag the debate away from the police abuse. Maybe you should become a conservative politician, you have all the debate tactics.

  10. @IamtheSamis

    No, me saying I misread you saying conscience was saying I misread what you wrote, as you were asking me where you said Concise. Remember the context of the post I was replying to, it was you asking me where you had said concise, so I went and looked and you were correct, and I had misread, so I pointed out WHERE and WHAT I had misread. The rest has been your failing, not mine.

  11. @BusinessIDBAI Lastly, even if this is one large misunderstanding the issue lies in how you worded yourself. “No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI

    What you should have written was “I misread you saying concise”. After I proved I didn’t call you non – concise you switched to conscience which is why I keep using “Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI. Now I retire. . .

  12. @BusinessIDBAI “The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience.” – BusinessIDBAI -“No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI
    But you didn’t speak about consciousness↓
    “Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI
    Next time use all 3 quotes together like I did. The 2nd quote proves my point. Give up, dude

  13. @BusinessIDBAI “No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI

    You forgot to paste this one along with it like I did earlier. You know, your original excuse that proves me correct. The quote you’re using to make my claims look inaccurate is the second excuse you used after I debunked the first one. I posted it along with my reply below to display how many times you excuse has changed. They are all your quotes

  14. @IamtheSamis

    And further more, you’re showing your inability to read:
    “The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience.” – BusinessIDBAI –

    But you didn’t speak about consciousness↓
    “Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI
    Once again. If you thought I said consciousness then why doesn’t your reply match – IamtheSamis –

    Read that again, notice your error in comprehension.

  15. @IamtheSamis

    Can you explain why I would speak about consciousness if I thought you said I wasn’t concise? It’s pretty funny you’re talking about literacy when you don’t notice how your accusation is self-contradictory. As I said, and as you quoted, I misread you saying conscience, reading it as concise.

    You sir, still go ahead and continue to lie, staying what, 1-2 days ago that you’re done with this conversation? And you lied about me responding to you to start this whole thing. Projection.

  16. @BusinessIDBAI “The reason I would reply speaking about conciseness, is because I thought you said concise, when you had actually said conscience.” – BusinessIDBAI –

    “No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI

    But you didn’t speak about consciousness↓

    “Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI

    Once again. If you thought I said consciousness then why doesn’t your reply match

  17. @BusinessIDBAI Once again I will prove with your own words how you are lying. The issue is that you claimed I accused you of being non – CONCISE. “Wow dude, 3 posts, and you say I’m not concise?” – BusinessIDBAI – Your claim was proven false so then you said “No, the problem was, I misread you saying CONSCIENCE. Misreading and misremembering isn’t making up. Get over it.” – BusinessIDBAI – So if you thought I said conscience why did you make the first statement I quoted?

  18. I love it @ 0:32 that the lil web-cam ”pilot” takes a quick look before closing the cockpit

  19. You know it’s fake when the transformation seem so smooth and fast, wonder how long till we can make a real one like that…

  20. โคตรเนียนเลยครับ ไม่มีที่ติ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *